![]() ![]() Note that when I presented the first equations at the 12 th Symposium of the Hellenic Nuclear Physics Society, our new ideas met much opposition, though the equations were able for explaining the two-electron coupling of the quantum mechanics. In my paper "Spin-spin interactions of electrons and also of nucleons create atomic molecular and nuclear structures" one sees that the applictions of electromagnetic laws under the rules of the quantum mechanics lead to the enormous success for describing atomic and molecular structures. Whereas in our discovery of the PHOTON -MATTER INTERACTION we showed that the absorption of photons mass and energy by electrons is responsible for the increase of the electron mass in accelerators leading to the velocity υ >c of the discovery of the electron spin and applied carefully the laws of Coulomb and Biot-Savard on the spinning electrons. On the other hand we showed that the enormous peripheral velocity u of the electron spin (u > c) cannot be affected by the absorptions of photons. The paper was presented at the 12 th Symposium of the Hellenic Nuclear Physics Society (2002) and published in Ind.J. Under this crisis of atomic physics and the following crisis in nuclear physics, due to the discovery of the assumed uncharged neutron (1932), we prepared in 2002 our paper “ Nuclear structure is governed by the fundamental laws of electromagnetism” which contains also the electron-electron attraction of opposite spin in atomic orbitals. So in “Helium atom-WIKIPEDIA” one reads “ Unlike for hydrogen a closed -form solution to the Schrodinger equation for the Helium atom has not been found'”. However it is indeed unfortunate that the discovery of the electron spin met much opposition by physicists, including Pauli, who suggested his qualitative “Exclusion principle”, which cannot be applied in the simplest nuclear structure (Deutron). In 1925 the discovery of the electron spin showed that the peripheral velocity of the electron spin is greater than the speed of light ( u > c ), which means that two electrons of opposite spin exert stronger magnetic attraction than the electric repulsion. One can also find my paper of 2003 “ Nuclear structure is governed by the by the fundamental laws of electromagnetism” in which a large number of equations revealed the nuclear structure.ĭespite the enormous success of the Bohr model and the quantum mechanics in the one-electron atoms based on the proton-electron interaction of electromagnetic laws, neither was able to provide a satisfactory explanation of the many-electron atoms (electron-electron attraction) even in the simplest case of the Helium atom, because Heisenberg and Dirac in 1926 under the influence of the invalid Einstein’s relativity abandoned the electromagnetic laws of the spinning electrons and introduced qualitative approaches of the so-called “Exchange interaction”. Einstein for his development of massless quanta of energy was based on wrong Maxwell's fields which led to his invalid relativity violating dramatically the two conservation laws of energy and mass. Writing in Google scholar “Kaliambos” one can see my p aper “Impact of Maxwell’s …dipolic particles” presented at the international conference " Frontiers of fundamental physics" (Olympia,1993) which invalidates Maxwell’s fields and Einstein's ideas. This scientific paper was announced to many universities around the world (March 2013). Dissert., Tomsk State University, Tomsk (2017).Revolution in atoms by reviving the laws under the discovery of the electron spin (1925) showing a peripheral velocity greater than the speed of lightīy prof. Usenko, Interaction of molecules and atoms of gas components with carbon structures, Author’s Abstract Cand. Erdeyi, Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. ![]() 2, State Publishing House of Technical and Theoretical Literature, Moscow (1956).į. Sommerfeld, Atomic Structure and Spectra, Vol. Blokhintsev, Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics, Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1961). Eklund, eds., Science of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes, Academic Press (1996), pp. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |